I am part of a small investment group that combines significant business experience in product marketing and communications with legal analysis and interpretation. My partners and I combine for over 50 years of experience in these fields.


Material published on this website is done without regard to the specific investment goals, needs or financial status of our visitors. What we publish is informational only. Our commentary should be viewed as an expression of views and opinion. Edva Group (“Edva”) is not an SEC registered advisor. Under no circumstances shall Edva Group be held liable for any actions or decisions that readers take as a result of what is contained herein. This website is authored by Edva, also known as Edva Court and/or Edvacourt, with significant input from one or more partners. Edva uses a pseudonym and will remain anonymous. Investors should do their own “independent” due diligence and/or consult with a licensed, qualified investment professional before taking any investment related decisions.

Edva does not warrant the accuracy or completeness of any information provided. While Edva believes its stated factual assumptions are materially true and accurate, we depend on various sources for information and we are not able to verify all information which comes to us. Significant effort is expended to ensure accuracy of materials presented, yet such accuracy can’t be guaranteed. Links provided by Edva are also for informational purposes. They are not meant to be nor should they be taken as implicit endorsements of the facts or views presented therein. Additionally, at times Edva will try to piece together information from various sources in an effort to deduce what may be transpiring with respect to a particular issuer. When we speculate based on such information or theories, if it is not already clear from the context, we attempt to make it understood that we are speculating (also known as “guessing”). Readers should be aware that this sort of speculative thinking or conjecture is part of our commentary. Additionally, without limiting the foregoing disclaimer we note that Edva also comments on the status of legal proceedings, information which we review in periodic SEC filings, and patents, USPTO filings and other proceedings related to the issuers we cover. However, we do not usually perform the level of legal or technical due diligence or research that lawyers or others would perform if they were representing one of the parties in question. Our commentary on legal and technology matters is, thus, not advice upon which any reader should rely in making investment decisions.

We generally own securities of the issuers we cover. In our sole discretion, members of our group may initiate, increase or reduce positions in the equity securities of the issuers we cover at any time and without notice to our readers or other parties. In some cases we may attempt to explain the reasoning behind such actions but we undertake no requirement to do so. The commentary and analysis that Edva provides is free of charge and has always been so. As authors we are not paid by, or in the service of, anyone we cover. We do not accept donations or compensation from retail investors to cover our costs of following and commenting on companies engaged in patent disputes (thanks to those who have offered), whether it involves personal appearances to cover hearings or trials or simply time associated with in-depth analysis. While we attempt to cover multiple issuers it is not possible for us, at this time, to cover all of the companies involved in the patent litigation space and we are not yet able to keep up with all developments in all the cases we cover.

See my profile on Seeking Alpha for more.

7 Responses to “About”

  1. John November 28, 2012 at 7:31 pm #

    Do you allow new members into your investment group?

    • edvapatent December 4, 2012 at 11:29 am #

      Hey John,
      Thanks for asking. Not at this time but you never know what the future holds.

  2. steve solomon April 16, 2013 at 1:52 am #

    Thank you for all your infp on WDDD I am looking forward to the hearing
    I am invested in another company called Blue Calypso BCYP in the same
    position as WDDD and would like your opinion on its IP
    Thanks again

    • edvapatent April 18, 2013 at 6:58 pm #

      Hey Steve,

      Thanks for your comment! I am aware of it but haven’t spent any time vetting the details of the case.

  3. George October 6, 2013 at 7:43 pm #

    What do you think about Activisions Blizzard patent infringement against WDDD?
    I was looking forward to your comments on this new development but you have not posted anything.

    • edvapatent October 7, 2013 at 4:49 am #

      It is simply another tactic George. There is no money to get from Worlds so the purpose is to distract and to make Worlds defend (and raise and spend $) or perhaps settle the current case on terms less favorable to them. I would think that Susman would have to take on this defense to protect their own interests and there may have been language in their original contract with Worlds that would cover such an event.

  4. george October 7, 2013 at 7:09 am #

    Hi Edva,
    I appreciate your reply. Are you saying the Activision counter claim has no merit?
    Also I heard the 690 patent has only 2 years left to ride. Is that true?
    It would be really helpful if you would do a write up to explain these things more
    clearly to us non legal minds. Thanks again

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s